Cardelitre ಠ_ಠ ۞_۟۞ ┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘ סּ_סּ | Voir ce message dans le sujet non filtré
Je ne doute pas que tu aies envie d'être convaincu. Personnellement la foi religieuse c'est pas mon truc, je préfère avoir des preuves.
duffy_mesgenoux a écrit :
si nature a invalidé la publication , ca ne veut pas dire que le scientifique fait fausse route. peut etre a t'il merdé ici ou la , sur "la forme". peut etre que sa publication de 2008 passera , ...elle !
ps: il /elle , bref
|
En l'occurrence, après vérification (que la journaliste n'a pas semblé bon de faire apparemment), Nature a bien publié le papier en question, avec les circonstances, les critiques et les nouvelles données des auteurs en prime. Donc rien à voir avec ce qui est prétendu...
Citation :
The following is the note from the Nature editor
In our 29 November issue, we published the paper "Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico" by David Quist and Ignacio Chapela. Subsequently, we received several criticisms of the paper, to which we obtained responses from the authors and consulted referees over the exchanges. In the meantime, the authors agreed to obtain further data, on a timetable agreed with us, that might prove beyond reasonable doubt that transgenes have indeed become integrated into the maize genome. The authors have now obtained some additional data, but there is disagreement between them and a referee as to whether these results significantly bolster their argument.
In light of these discussions and the diverse advice received, Nature has concluded that the evidence available is not sufficient to justify the publication of the original paper. As the authors nevertheless wish to stand by the available evidence for their conclusions, we feel it best simply to make these circumstances clear, to publish the criticisms, the authors' response and new data, and to allow our readers to judge the science for themselves.
Editor, Nature
|
---------------
Intra-Science - To thine own self be true
|