skYfIrE a écrit :
Le test de TFT Central plutôt bien réalisé montre que c'est un très bon écran en colorimétrie, contraste, uniformité : http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/review [...] 4065uc.htm Sinon pour les fuites de lumière, il se débrouille aussi très bien : http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/images [...] 080027.JPG
Très bon paragraphe sur le ratio résolution / taille d'écran : "The BDM4065UC is a very interesting option for desktop use. The quad HD 3840 x 2160 resolution is well suited to a screen as big as this and offers a comfortable pixel pitch and font size by default, without the need to do OS scaling. We had previously found the text size and pixel pitch a little too small when we tested the 31.5" sized Dell UP3214Q and certainly very tiny when we tested the 28" sized Samsung U28D590D. You can of course use various scaling methods to make 4k resolutions more usable on smaller screens, but it's not always easy to get something set up for all your uses. While some Operating systems scale well, others do not, and a lot of apps also have problems with the scaling. Here on the BDM4065UC you don't need to bother with scaling at all, you can just run the screen and operating system at it's normal settings without the text being too small. The pixel pitch of 0.2281 mm is very comparable to the 0.2331 mm of a 27" 2560 x 1440 resolution panel. This is perfectly fine for day to day use. With the high resolution and huge screen size you have plenty of room for multi-tasking and split screen working which is great news. For word processing, CAD/CAM, image editing, programming etc it's really a massive area to use." |
Bref, c'est un très bon investissement pour ceux qui veulent du grand écran mais pour les gamers, il faudra toujours rester sur une dalle TN bien plus réactive mais aussi plus petite.
|